79249775

Date: 2024-12-04 03:12:07
Score: 0.5
Natty:
Report link

Building on @JosefZ's answer, I've analyzed the sequence of row values (and it's the same for column values) and found a cool pattern in the differences between consecutive terms. Starting from the third term, the differences between consecutive terms follow this sequence:

By taking the base-2 logarithm of these differences, we get the sequence of values:

What stands out is that the logarithmic value 7 appears once, 6 appears twice, 5 appears four times, and so on. In general, for a difference of (2^n), it appears (2^{7-n}) times.

To quantify this, I derived a formula for the difference between the (n)-th and ((n-1))-th terms of the sequence:

difference = math.pow(2, 7 - math.floor(math.log2(n - 2)))

Then, I created a function to generate a mapping of the sequence using this formula:

import math

def generate_mapping(n: int) -> dict:
    mapping = {0: 1, 16256: 2}
    tmp = 16256

    for i in range(3, n + 1):
        tmp += math.pow(2, 7 - math.floor(math.log2(i - 2)))
        mapping[tmp] = i
    return mapping

To optimize this, we can replace the expression math.pow(2, 7 - math.floor(math.log2(n - 2))) with a bit-shift operation:

1 << (7 - (i - 2).bit_length() + 1)

This reduces computation time by avoiding floating-point operations. Here's the updated version of the function with the optimization:

def generate_mapping(n: int) -> dict:
    mapping = {0: 1, 16256: 2}
    tmp = 16256

    for i in range(3, n + 1):
        tmp += 1 << (7 - (i - 2).bit_length() + 1)
        mapping[tmp] = i
    return mapping

As you can see, the latter is much faster though this kind of optimization may be needless. contrast

After applying the optimized mapping, I get the following result:

The result As you can see, the strange row and column values have been successfully converted into indexes.

Reasons:
  • Long answer (-1):
  • Has code block (-0.5):
  • User mentioned (1): @JosefZ's
  • Low reputation (1):
Posted by: zahiko