Yes, according to wiki it is normal. The compiler also points out that i may not be initialized. However, this is incorrect in this case, as i is a local variable that was initialized at the start of the for loop, even if the end value was specified as the start value. I pointed this out because it is handled differently in other programming languages, which has the advantage that the value following the loop end value is directly available. Here you can help yourself by calculating end value+1 yourself and using it in the 2nd log. if the loop is exited prematurely, for example, you do not know up to which value the loop was run through.

Hannes