In C#, anonymous types are super handy for temporary structures, but they can't easily be returned from a method because they don't have a named type.
Example of an anonymous type:
csharp
CopyEdit
varresult = new { Name = "Alice", Age = 30 };
Inside a method? Fine.
Returning from a method? Not directly — unless you:
object
(not ideal, because you lose type safety)csharp
CopyEdit
publicobject GetPerson() { return new { Name = "Alice", Age = 30 }; }
Downside: You can't easily use .Name
and .Age
without casting/reflection.
dynamic
typecsharp
CopyEdit
publicdynamic GetPerson() { return new { Name = "Alice", Age = 30 }; }
Upside: Easier to access properties. Downside: No compile-time checking (errors at runtime if you mistype).
Best practice for returning structured data:
csharp
CopyEdit
publicclass PersonDto { public string Name { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } } public PersonDto GetPerson() { return new PersonDto { Name = "Alice", Age = 30 }; }
Strongly typed
Safer
Better for APIs, large projects, etc.
OptionProsConsobjectQuick hackNo type safetydynamicEasy accessRuntime errorsReal classBest choiceSlightly more code
If you meant Python or JavaScript, they naturally return anonymous structures all the time:
python
CopyEdit
defget_person(): return {"name": "Alice", "age": 30}
javascript
CopyEdit
functiongetPerson() { return { name: "Alice", age: 30 }; }
In dynamic languages, anonymous types are normal and no problem at all.
Refrence site https://stackoverflow.com