79594825

Date: 2025-04-27 08:15:23
Score: 1
Natty:
Report link

In C (and similar languages)

In C#, anonymous types are super handy for temporary structures, but they can't easily be returned from a method because they don't have a named type.

Example of an anonymous type:

csharp

CopyEdit

varresult = new { Name = "Alice", Age = 30 };

Inside a method? Fine.
Returning from a method? Not directly — unless you:


Options to Return Anonymous-Like Data

  1. Return as object (not ideal, because you lose type safety)
csharp

CopyEdit

publicobject GetPerson() { return new { Name = "Alice", Age = 30 }; }

Downside: You can't easily use .Name and .Age without casting/reflection.


  1. Use dynamic type
csharp

CopyEdit

publicdynamic GetPerson() { return new { Name = "Alice", Age = 30 }; }

Upside: Easier to access properties. Downside: No compile-time checking (errors at runtime if you mistype).


  1. Define a real class instead

Best practice for returning structured data:

csharp

CopyEdit

publicclass PersonDto { public string Name { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } } public PersonDto GetPerson() { return new PersonDto { Name = "Alice", Age = 30 }; }


Quick Summary

OptionProsConsobjectQuick hackNo type safetydynamicEasy accessRuntime errorsReal classBest choiceSlightly more code

In Python, JavaScript, etc.

If you meant Python or JavaScript, they naturally return anonymous structures all the time:

python

CopyEdit

defget_person(): return {"name": "Alice", "age": 30}

javascript

CopyEdit

functiongetPerson() { return { name: "Alice", age: 30 }; }

In dynamic languages, anonymous types are normal and no problem at all.

Refrence site https://stackoverflow.com

Reasons:
  • Blacklisted phrase (1): stackoverflow
  • Long answer (-1):
  • Has code block (-0.5):
  • Contains question mark (0.5):
  • Low reputation (1):
Posted by: Sherwali Khan