You're observing different execution orders because of how JavaScript's event loop handles **macrotasks** and **microtasks**.
- `setTimeout(..., 0)` is a **macrotask** (added to the macrotask queue).
- `.then()` from a `fetch` is a **microtask** (added to the microtask queue).
- Microtasks are **always executed before** the next macrotask, after the current execution stack is empty.
---
When you use `setTimeout(..., 0)` and `fetch(...)`, here’s what happens:
1. Synchronous code runs first.
2. Microtasks (like `.then()` from `fetch`) are processed.
3. Then macrotasks (like `setTimeout`) are processed.
That’s why in most browsers:
console.log(“A”); // sync
fetch(…).then(…) // microtask
setTimeout(…, 0) // macrotask
console.log(“B”); // sync
---
Changing to `setTimeout(..., 1)` gives the event loop more time, so the fetch may resolve before the timeout happens — but it's **not guaranteed**. It's a race condition depending on network timing and browser internals.
---
Node uses a slightly different event loop model. The key difference is:
- `setTimeout` goes into the **Timers phase**
- `fetch` is not native to Node and uses the **microtask queue** after a Promise resolves
So in Node, `setTimeout(..., 0)` often logs before `.then()` due to **phase timing differences**.
---
- Microtasks (`Promise.then`, `fetch`) run **before** macrotasks (`setTimeout`).
- Timing differences in browsers vs. Node.js are due to **event loop phase priorities**.
- `setTimeout(..., 0)` does **not mean immediate execution**, just “as soon as possible after current tasks.”