79775003

Date: 2025-09-25 14:58:51
Score: 1
Natty:
Report link

Your approach can cause high memory usage with large integers, as it creates a sparse array filled with undefined values. The filter step also adds unnecessary overhead. For large datasets, it's inefficient compared to JavaScript's built-in .sort() or algorithms like Counting Sort or Radix Sort for specialized cases. Stick with .sort() for practicality and performance.

Reasons:
  • Has code block (-0.5):
  • Single line (0.5):
  • Low reputation (1):
Posted by: X Coder